Hair is such an emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Frizzy hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on a female, so valued as an indicator of exquisite beauty in certain areas of the entire world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is really a common problem affecting the majority of women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the use of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it’s often followed closely by feelings of poor self-confidence, a feeling of isolation and low self worth.
Because the times when bearded feamales in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to get rid of any trace of hair from any and every part of their body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it’s not merely women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is at the mercy of pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair may be just like vilified by the male population nowadays because the female.
Different Ways of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth may be caused by many factors, such as for example, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only real permanent way of hair removal, is a treatment that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and now, as a result of society’s attitudes, the number of male clients is increasing.
To generally meet this need there as been many hair removal measures some that return back centuries in history. Hair removal ‘s been around since caveman times but interestingly the areas of the body we’re removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the pinnacle and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but also for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but additionally the ancient Egyptians and it absolutely was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the pinnacle would take away the benefit of an adversary having anything to grab onto along with having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. Actually these women removed most of their body hair, aside from eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It was also considered uncivilized for guys to own hair on their face. Facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of an individual of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a questionnaire of razors made of flint or bronze because the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
They also used a technique of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) will be applied to the skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the equivalent of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which can be recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn will be placed through the fingers of both hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of their eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads to be able to give the appearance of a longer brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to see the obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from ab muscles beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are all temporary methods that many people try today. Actually new hair removal devices seem to appear like buses – every 20 minutes approximately! However, technology has managed to move on and with it, it appears that there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a restricted category since the former has been banned in some countries just like the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are a few of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on their effectiveness.
Electrolysis remains the only real proven permanent way of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited from this tried and trusted treatment. It is usually the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation inside their clients, from a shy, introverted personality in the beginning of a class of treatments, to a comfortable and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a multi million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though will have significantly more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none that relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this in mind there is only 1 system on the market today that will totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a healthcare facility laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered an important tool in the work of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It offers cosmetic relief for the customer with mild hirsute problems to the patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require much time of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what what ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached when the hairs which have been removed don’t grow back for a period of one year after the past treatment, permanent reduction may be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains to this day, the main one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for example LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it’s now realised, are at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The stark reality is that this is wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The stark reality is that whilst they’ve their successes they also have their limitations – they cannot treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ however not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The stark reality is this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for it to target. Along with this, for unknown reason(s) not most of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The residual 5% – 15% hair will be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but nevertheless stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only real option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down seriously to additional electrolysis treatment to perform the job. Laser and IPL are now actually recognised to become a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators make use of a burst of filtered light directed at one hair at a time. After the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light found in the device is targeted from the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. To enable this technique, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through which the light was flashed. There is no clinical data published so far to aid any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method using its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was patented in 1959. This method functions passing an electric energy through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of the skin by grasping them for several minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations because the claim of electricity destroying the root of the hair does not have any scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published up to now to ascertain the claim that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the use of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches as opposed to cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the use of a needle. A DC electric energy is passed through a conductive gel on the surface of the skin via an adhesive patch added to the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric energy that travels down seriously to the hair follicle.
To date no clinical data is available and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair doesn’t conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the outer lining of the skin as opposed to passing through the hair. 香港脫毛 Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the root of the hair to destroy it does not have any scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and along the way they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into the skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long term hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it’s ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this can be a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcome up to now regarding a software to market in April 2010 of the newest device.